• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Dietitians for Professional Integrity

  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Resources
    • Advocacy & Action Toolkit
    • Conflict-Free CEUs
    • Distinguished Dietitians
    • Ethical Sponsorship
    • FNCE Guides & Reports
    • Like-Minded Organizations
    • RD Resource Toolkit
    • Statements of Concern
    • Understand The Issues
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Search

Feb 15, 2013 Leave a Comment

Statement of Concern from Leslie Riding, RD

Today’s statement of concern comes from Registered Dietitian Leslie Riding (Twitter handle @lesscheid):

“I am highly concerned with how the public perceives Registered Dietitians. Our expertise in nutrition is only as useful as the public’s trust in our knowledge and practice.

To illustrate why this issue is important to me, I want to share a conversation I recently had:

I was getting ready to exercise at the gym I attend regularly. The owner of the facility called me over to introduce me to another client and proceeded to introduce me as a nutritionist. I politely corrected him and mentioned that I am a Registered Dietitian. He told me that he left that part out of the introduction so that my “credibility would not be called into question”, and then proceeded to tell me that I am the only RD he would feel comfortable referring his clients to for nutrition information.

In past discussions with him about the issue of RD credibility, he shared that he has observed that many dietitians are too closely linked with the food industry for him to feel confident that their instruction is unbiased, and that messages of moderation in relation to nutrition are a disservice to those striving for better health.

We can only turn the tide in this perception by removing corporate and industry influence over the education programs that are approved by our very own professional organization. It is a shame that, despite receiving extensive nutrition science education to become RDs, our credibility is continuously called into question by members of the general public because of our organization’s corporate ties.

I also want to take this opportunity to address the arguments some RDs made to me recently about how continuing education programs would be difficult to provide without food industry funding. According to these RDs, FNCE and state dietetic meetings could potentially double in cost for attendees without outside funding – honoraria and travel costs for speakers being among the costs to cover.

Perhaps we should rely more on local expertise to present at meetings, eliminating the need to cover thousands of dollars in travel costs. Whether a meeting is in Boston, Philadelphia, San Diego, or Phoenix, all these cities – and other cities nearby — have experts who can be recruited to speak on various nutrition issues.

Another question we must pose: why rely on corporations for education sessions when so many of our non-corporate colleagues, who are knowledgeable in a variety of topics, can present? Is it because RDs with ties to the food industry can put RDs “at ease” that PepsiCo understands the science of fiber?

Let’s also remember that AND has stated that corporate sponsorship only accounts for nine percent of funding. Relatively speaking, that is a small amount that can surely be obtained without having to depend on Coca-Cola, Hershey’s, PepsiCo, and Kellogg’s.

I want my credential to be well-represented, a task I do not think the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics currently does well.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Categories: Statements of Concern Tags: PepsiCo, statements of concern

Reader Interactions

Leave a Comment Cancel

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

sidebar

Blog Sidebar

Social Media

FacebookTwitter

Subscribe to receive our quarterly newsletter and other breaking news!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Browse by Topic

  • Academic Research
  • Advocacy
  • Distinguished Dietitians
  • Ethical Sponsorship
  • Industry Spin
  • Industry-Funded Research
  • Interviews
  • Photos
  • Problematic Sponsorship
  • Recommended Reads
  • Reports
  • Statements of Concern
  • Uncategorized

Tags

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics American Beverage Association Andy Bellatti Big Tobacco California Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Center for Science in the Public Interest CEUs Civil Eats Coca-Cola ConAgra conflicts of interest Corn Refiners Association FNCE front groups General Mills Global Energy Balance Network Hershey's industry-funded research junk food Kellogg Kids Eat Right Kraft Kraft Singles lobbying Marion Nestle marketing marketing to children Mars McDonald's meat industry Michele Simon moderation National Dairy Council Nestlé New York Times PepsiCo policy soda soda tax soda taxes sugar The Sugar Association Unilever World Health Organization Yoni Freedhoff

Footer

Subscribe to receive our quarterly newsletter and other breaking news!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Recent Posts

Farewell to Our Supporters

Dear DFPI Supporters, Since February of 2013, we at Dietitians For Professional Integrity have been a voice for uplifting the registered dietitian credential at a time when corporate influences - both overt and covert Read More

Highly Processed Foods Can Negatively Impact Health

Good read from New York Times on how highly processed foods (and the ingredients in many of them) can negatively impact health by creating an imbalance in the gut microbiome. This is the future of nutrition. The fact Read More

Social Media

FacebookTwitter

RSS

  • RSS - Posts

© 2021 Dietitians for Professional Integrity