• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Dietitians for Professional Integrity

  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Resources
    • Advocacy & Action Toolkit
    • Conflict-Free CEUs
    • Distinguished Dietitians
    • Ethical Sponsorship
    • FNCE Guides & Reports
    • Like-Minded Organizations
    • RD Resource Toolkit
    • Statements of Concern
    • Understand The Issues
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Search

Feb 22, 2013 Leave a Comment

Statement of Concern from Brooke Alpert, MS, RD, CDN

Today’s statement of concern comes from Brooke Alpert, MS, RD, CDN (Twitter handle: @bnutritious):

“As a dietitian with a private practice, my clients look to me directly as the expert and as someone whose advice they should follow to achieve their nutritional goals.

I need them to trust me that I’m properly schooled/informed to best educate them on what’s healthful, what foods should be plentiful in their specific diets, as well as the latest nutrition research and science. I need them to believe that my opinions are based on the best available research out there, not corporate sponsors or Big Pharma.

As a dietitian who often recommends to clients that they eliminate soda (diet or otherwise), I am appalled that Coca-Cola is allowed to provide continuing education credits for dietitians. It has also been concerning to see individuals who work in the soft drink industry present at different sessions at our annual conference. I can’t believe that many sessions and webinars targeted at RDs continually make the claim that soda and artificial sweeteners are perfectly fine as long as they are “part of a balanced diet”.

Nothing made this more clear than a session I attended last October at the annual AND conference (FNCE). I had been working on my book (which is all about sugar) for several months, and was excited to spot a lecture on artificial sweeteners. I was eager to attend and learn, especially since over the past years concerns about their safety and effects on everything from metabolism to perceived satiety came to light.

Instead of a healthy mix of research presented (at the very least acknowledging some of the newer research), the entire lecture was one sided. The conclusion? There is nothing wrong with artificial sweeteners. I attended this talk as a dietitian wanting to be updated on a very newsworthy topic. I walked away feeling as if I had been “prepped” to do PR for soft drink companies.

There are so many confusing claims, myths, and information out “there” today that already make it difficult to reach, and clearly speak to, our audience. The last thing we as RDs need is our professional organization’s actions and behaviors to send the message that our opinions are not based on actual science and research, but instead available for purchase.

I am not suggesting the answer is to turn our backs on AND, but this certainly feels like a very large, uphill battle most days. I am grateful that RDs are starting to speak up and form a voice that deserves to be heard. My hope is that, just like AND is so willing to “sit at the table” with Big Food, that they also want to “sit at the table” with their own concerned constituents.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Categories: Statements of Concern Tags: Coca-Cola, FNCE

Reader Interactions

Leave a Comment Cancel

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

sidebar

Blog Sidebar

Social Media

FacebookTwitter

Subscribe to receive our quarterly newsletter and other breaking news!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Browse by Topic

  • Academic Research
  • Advocacy
  • Distinguished Dietitians
  • Ethical Sponsorship
  • Industry Spin
  • Industry-Funded Research
  • Interviews
  • Photos
  • Problematic Sponsorship
  • Recommended Reads
  • Reports
  • Statements of Concern
  • Uncategorized

Tags

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics American Beverage Association Andy Bellatti Big Tobacco California Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Center for Science in the Public Interest CEUs Civil Eats Coca-Cola ConAgra conflicts of interest Corn Refiners Association FNCE front groups General Mills Global Energy Balance Network Hershey's industry-funded research junk food Kellogg Kids Eat Right Kraft Kraft Singles lobbying Marion Nestle marketing marketing to children Mars McDonald's meat industry Michele Simon moderation National Dairy Council Nestlé New York Times PepsiCo policy soda soda tax soda taxes sugar The Sugar Association Unilever World Health Organization Yoni Freedhoff

Footer

Subscribe to receive our quarterly newsletter and other breaking news!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Recent Posts

Farewell to Our Supporters

Dear DFPI Supporters, Since February of 2013, we at Dietitians For Professional Integrity have been a voice for uplifting the registered dietitian credential at a time when corporate influences - both overt and covert Read More

Highly Processed Foods Can Negatively Impact Health

Good read from New York Times on how highly processed foods (and the ingredients in many of them) can negatively impact health by creating an imbalance in the gut microbiome. This is the future of nutrition. The fact Read More

Social Media

FacebookTwitter

RSS

  • RSS - Posts

© 2021 Dietitians for Professional Integrity