• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Dietitians for Professional Integrity

  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Resources
    • Advocacy & Action Toolkit
    • Conflict-Free CEUs
    • Distinguished Dietitians
    • Ethical Sponsorship
    • FNCE Guides & Reports
    • Like-Minded Organizations
    • RD Resource Toolkit
    • Statements of Concern
    • Understand The Issues
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Search

Feb 28, 2013 Leave a Comment

Statement of Concern from Judy Converse, MPH, RD

Today’s statement of concern comes from Judy Converse, MPH, RD:

RDs and Corporate Influence

“The catch phrase tossed around often now in medical circles is “evidence based”. That’s supposed to signal a consciousness for information that is produced by our hallowed scientific method, and reviewed by a panel of impartial experts.

Dietitians love this phrase too, and have co-opted it into their lexicon. They like to be The Experts In Nutrition and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (AND, formerly ADA) wants everyone to know that. But are they shooting themselves in the food pyramid with corporate influence? I mean, plate? Or whatever it is now?

I became a registered dietitian in 1989. I also have graduate and undergraduate nutrition degrees, like many RDs. As soon as my state had licensure, I became licensed. And early on, I got involved in my state dietetic association (Hawaii at the time) and became public relations chairperson. I was passionate about nutrition and eager to spread my wings.

One of the first tasks I was asked to complete in that role was to go on local news and defend McDonald’s.

It went like this: McDonald’s of Hawaii donated handsomely to the Hawaii Dietetic Association. Then one day in 1993 a chatty newscaster made an off-hand remark about McDonald’s food that McDonald’s of Hawaii did not like. They called the Hawaii Dietetic Association to fix it. And the HDA board called me. I was young and eager to get along with all these ladies who had just brought me onto the board.

Just last week, I found the 20-year-old videotape and ‘cringeworthy’ is the best word you could use to describe it. Of course, my point of view has since changed considerably (you won’t see me defending McDonald’s in any way, shape, or form).

But, what that videotape makes clear is that money talks. AND has grand intentions. But when there is money involved, we don’t think clearly, and our credibility tanks. I certainly didn’t get paid for this stint, but the pressure to conform was strong. Not long after this, I quit the board, and not long after that, I dropped my AND membership completely – because of what struck me as undue corporate influence on the journal, on the AND’s position statements, and on how this organization presented its own profession to the public
.
Since 1993, not much has changed. Attend any FNCE (AND’s annual conference) and you will find a lot of money floating around from ConAgra, Coca Cola, and any number of big food processors, not to mention companies engaging in questionable marketing for foods to children. With money like this, the evidence base erodes. My experience was that my professional organization did not robustly support science and practice beyond that corporate box – and that’s no basis for sound evidence.

AND would be a more credible organization with less top-heavy, procedural bureaucracy and more outreach into the real food policy issues affecting Americans today, including the environmental and health impacts of mega-agriculture, the true healing power of whole foods, and effective use of supplements and herbs. Their aversion for controversy – in a profession with no shortage of controversial topics – appears to be all about placating their sponsors.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Categories: Statements of Concern Tags: Coca-Cola, ConAgra, FNCE, McDonald's

Reader Interactions

Leave a Comment Cancel

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

sidebar

Blog Sidebar

Social Media

FacebookTwitter

Subscribe to receive our quarterly newsletter and other breaking news!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Browse by Topic

  • Academic Research
  • Advocacy
  • Distinguished Dietitians
  • Ethical Sponsorship
  • Industry Spin
  • Industry-Funded Research
  • Interviews
  • Photos
  • Problematic Sponsorship
  • Recommended Reads
  • Reports
  • Statements of Concern
  • Uncategorized

Tags

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics American Beverage Association Andy Bellatti Big Tobacco California Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Center for Science in the Public Interest CEUs Civil Eats Coca-Cola ConAgra conflicts of interest Corn Refiners Association FNCE front groups General Mills Global Energy Balance Network Hershey's industry-funded research junk food Kellogg Kids Eat Right Kraft Kraft Singles lobbying Marion Nestle marketing marketing to children Mars McDonald's meat industry Michele Simon moderation National Dairy Council Nestlé New York Times PepsiCo policy soda soda tax soda taxes sugar The Sugar Association Unilever World Health Organization Yoni Freedhoff

Footer

Subscribe to receive our quarterly newsletter and other breaking news!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Recent Posts

Farewell to Our Supporters

Dear DFPI Supporters, Since February of 2013, we at Dietitians For Professional Integrity have been a voice for uplifting the registered dietitian credential at a time when corporate influences - both overt and covert Read More

Highly Processed Foods Can Negatively Impact Health

Good read from New York Times on how highly processed foods (and the ingredients in many of them) can negatively impact health by creating an imbalance in the gut microbiome. This is the future of nutrition. The fact Read More

Social Media

FacebookTwitter

RSS

  • RSS - Posts

© 2021 Dietitians for Professional Integrity