• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Dietitians for Professional Integrity

  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Resources
    • Advocacy & Action Toolkit
    • Conflict-Free CEUs
    • Distinguished Dietitians
    • Ethical Sponsorship
    • FNCE Guides & Reports
    • Like-Minded Organizations
    • RD Resource Toolkit
    • Statements of Concern
    • Understand The Issues
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Search

Mar 26, 2013 Leave a Comment

Statement of Concern from Rachel Harvest, MS, RD

Today’s statement of concern comes from Rachel Harvest, MS, RD (Twitter handle: @RachHNutrition):

“We are nutrition professionals dedicated to providing people with education and specific therapies that improve overall health and wellness and act as a preventive measure against chronic disease.

It is difficult to meet a client or patient where they are and gradually get them to a place where health, wellness, and nutritional knowledge reflect our ideals when the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics’ corporate sponsors relay a message that such an ideal is unachievable.

In a way, these sponsorships separate us from our patients and clients. No matter how empathetic and understanding we are about their treatment, we are more likely to be met with resistance because our message is negated. The companies that sponsor our professional organizations are the same ones that send messages that suggest healthful eating is “too time consuming” or that fiber “tastes like cardboard”.

These partnerships (i.e.: PepsiCo, Coca-Cola, etc.) further the inaccurate perception that we RDs are the “food police”. It’s as if because we *don’t* think that Cheetos or soda are “fine in moderation” like our corporate sponsors want us to believe, we are accused of creating unattainable “rules”.

The current sponsorship model has zero integrity. An organization that should be the pillar of health and wellness can’t find appropriate representation to back its mission? Or is it, more likely, a lack of effort to find supportive organizations and products to support AND’s mission?

It’s no doubt that sponsorship is necessary in order to keep the organization going, but the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics should be requesting that sponsorship from companies with a basis in integrity themselves. The thing about integrity is — you either have it, or you don’t. There’s no such thing as “sort of having integrity”. That’s like being “sort of” pregnant.

If you’ve got integrity, it has to permeate.

I would like to see AND set standards for sponsors that correlate with healthful practices. Companies who do not meet these standards would not be eligible for sponsorship. For example, companies whose product portfolios are full of controversial/questionable ingredients (artificial dyes, BHA, artificial trans fats, etc.) should not have the opportunity to sponsor us.

This ought to toss out quite a few of these sponsors that are simply not aligned with our views, what we promote, and what we want to establish: our integrity. If this gets advertised, I’m sure many businesses that create products that meet these standards would come forward to support AND.

Why? Because those sorts of businesses operate on integrity too. They currently see how AND operates now and are not having a part in it.

Integrity is viral. If you have it, you are surrounded by it, because you don’t accept anything less. If changes like this are taken on, I’m be more than happy to proclaim the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics as my guiding organization.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)

Related

Categories: Statements of Concern Tags: Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, trans fat

Reader Interactions

Leave a Comment Cancel

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

sidebar

Blog Sidebar

Social Media

FacebookTwitter

Subscribe to receive our quarterly newsletter and other breaking news!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Browse by Topic

  • Academic Research
  • Advocacy
  • Distinguished Dietitians
  • Ethical Sponsorship
  • Industry Spin
  • Industry-Funded Research
  • Interviews
  • Photos
  • Problematic Sponsorship
  • Recommended Reads
  • Reports
  • Statements of Concern
  • Uncategorized

Tags

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics American Beverage Association Andy Bellatti Big Tobacco California Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Center for Science in the Public Interest CEUs Civil Eats Coca-Cola ConAgra conflicts of interest Corn Refiners Association FNCE front groups General Mills Global Energy Balance Network Hershey's industry-funded research junk food Kellogg Kids Eat Right Kraft Kraft Singles lobbying Marion Nestle marketing marketing to children Mars McDonald's meat industry Michele Simon moderation National Dairy Council Nestlé New York Times PepsiCo policy soda soda tax soda taxes sugar The Sugar Association Unilever World Health Organization Yoni Freedhoff

Footer

Subscribe to receive our quarterly newsletter and other breaking news!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Recent Posts

Farewell to Our Supporters

Dear DFPI Supporters, Since February of 2013, we at Dietitians For Professional Integrity have been a voice for uplifting the registered dietitian credential at a time when corporate influences - both overt and covert Read More

Highly Processed Foods Can Negatively Impact Health

Good read from New York Times on how highly processed foods (and the ingredients in many of them) can negatively impact health by creating an imbalance in the gut microbiome. This is the future of nutrition. The fact Read More

Social Media

FacebookTwitter

RSS

  • RSS - Posts

© 2019 Dietitians for Professional Integrity