• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Dietitians for Professional Integrity

  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Resources
    • Advocacy & Action Toolkit
    • Conflict-Free CEUs
    • Distinguished Dietitians
    • Ethical Sponsorship
    • FNCE Guides & Reports
    • Like-Minded Organizations
    • RD Resource Toolkit
    • Statements of Concern
    • Understand The Issues
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Search

Apr 01, 2013 Leave a Comment

Statement of Concern from Ana Johnson, RD, CDE

Today’s statement of concern comes from Ana Johnson, RD, CDE (Twitter handle: @wholelifediets):

“Most of you non-RDs probably don’t know, but the American Dietetic Association recently changed its name to the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (AND). This change didn’t really make sense to me because I feel like it sounds like a school now with the word “academy” in the title. Then, this month on National Registered Dietitian day, they also decided that RDs (Registered Dietitians) can also start using the title RDN (Registered Dietitian Nutritionist). I think the RDN is ok because half the people I work with want to call me a nutritionist anyway. So, now I no longer have to correct them. Great!

The purpose of this post is not to update you on the pointless name changes, but to discuss something that has been really upsetting me lately in my profession.

AND has done a good job of promoting RDs as “THE” experts in nutrition and dietetics. In terms of clinical nutrition, in the US, RDs are the only ones who can practice medical nutrition therapy in hospitals, nursing homes, and long-term care facilities. RDs do have a specific set of training and skills which is standardized and determined by the Commission for Dietetic Registration. This standardization gives RDs a lot of job flexibility in that they are eligible to do a variety of different jobs including clinical nutrition, food service, and community nutrition. I am happy with those options, as I know that with my RD license I will always have a job. Awesome for RDs!

But, it has come to my attention that although AND has promoted the RD as the nutrition expert and the CDR has standardized our qualifications and education, AND is now (and has been for awhile) doing us as nutrition professionals a great disservice.

One of the primary reasons I am not a member of AND (other than it is expensive and I don’t see the real benefit), is the fact that they gladly accept corporate sponsorship from companies like PepsiCo and McDonald’s. Companies like this are allowed to sponsor continuing education units and lectures at the annual AND meeting. Coca-cola particularly has been allowed to give presentations regarding how sugar is “not that bad” and provide RDs with information like this (I particularly enjoy the part where they say that increased sugar intake cannot be linked to obesity…WHAT???).

In a recent article, an RD was discussing how McDonald’s breakfast (the SUPER high sugar oatmeal) is a healthy choice. I will challenge you to eat the oatmeal and see how you feel a few hours later, my bet is that you will be STARVING and looking for more carbs. How is this a good thing?

I think RDs need to stand together and take back their organization. I don’t think its bad for RDs to work for these corporations, as maybe they can promote positive change, but I think our message needs to be clear. Real food = good nutrition. Fake food (filled with chemicals, sugar, trans fats) will NEVER be an ideal diet for humans. There is NO man-made food that can replace the nutrition provided by locally grown, organic fruits, vegetables, and grass-fed meats.

It may be idealistic to think everyone can eat this way, but RDs and other nutrition professionals are determined and smart enough to figure out ways to impact real change in our food systems, especially if we take back our organization and start a real conversation without the influence of corporate sponsorship. If you are an RD, consider joining the Facebook group “Dietitians for Professional Integrity” to learn more.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Categories: Statements of Concern Tags: Coca-Cola, McDonald's, PepsiCo

Reader Interactions

Leave a Comment Cancel

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

sidebar

Blog Sidebar

Social Media

FacebookTwitter

Subscribe to receive our quarterly newsletter and other breaking news!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Browse by Topic

  • Academic Research
  • Advocacy
  • Distinguished Dietitians
  • Ethical Sponsorship
  • Industry Spin
  • Industry-Funded Research
  • Interviews
  • Photos
  • Problematic Sponsorship
  • Recommended Reads
  • Reports
  • Statements of Concern
  • Uncategorized

Tags

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics American Beverage Association Andy Bellatti Big Tobacco California Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Center for Science in the Public Interest CEUs Civil Eats Coca-Cola ConAgra conflicts of interest Corn Refiners Association FNCE front groups General Mills Global Energy Balance Network Hershey's industry-funded research junk food Kellogg Kids Eat Right Kraft Kraft Singles lobbying Marion Nestle marketing marketing to children Mars McDonald's meat industry Michele Simon moderation National Dairy Council Nestlé New York Times PepsiCo policy soda soda tax soda taxes sugar The Sugar Association Unilever World Health Organization Yoni Freedhoff

Footer

Subscribe to receive our quarterly newsletter and other breaking news!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Recent Posts

Farewell to Our Supporters

Dear DFPI Supporters, Since February of 2013, we at Dietitians For Professional Integrity have been a voice for uplifting the registered dietitian credential at a time when corporate influences - both overt and covert Read More

Highly Processed Foods Can Negatively Impact Health

Good read from New York Times on how highly processed foods (and the ingredients in many of them) can negatively impact health by creating an imbalance in the gut microbiome. This is the future of nutrition. The fact Read More

Social Media

FacebookTwitter

RSS

  • RSS - Posts

© 2021 Dietitians for Professional Integrity