• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Dietitians for Professional Integrity

  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Resources
    • Advocacy & Action Toolkit
    • Conflict-Free CEUs
    • Distinguished Dietitians
    • Ethical Sponsorship
    • FNCE Guides & Reports
    • Like-Minded Organizations
    • RD Resource Toolkit
    • Statements of Concern
    • Understand The Issues
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Search

Mar 26, 2014 Leave a Comment

The Food Industry Wants to Keep Artificial Trans Fats in the Food Supply

If you ever attend the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics’ annual conference (the Food and Nutrition Conference and Expo, also known as FNCE) you would think the food industry’s number one priority was the health of Americans.

Big Food and Big Beverage’s most notorious players — including Academy partners like Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Kellogg’s, and General Mills — have an abundance of glossy brochures and impressive soundbites about their desire to provide health and wellness (and ‘convenience’!) to consumers.

As we always say, though, the food industry’s real priorities become loud and clear anytime health policy that has the potential to affect their daily operations and bottom line comes into play.

Consider, for example, the recent proposal by the Food & Drug Administration to phase out artificial trans fats from the food supply. By no means the first-of-its-kind legislation (Denmark and Switzerland did this successfully several years back), it has nevertheless put the food industry in full-on defense mode.

The scientific evidence showing the tremendous harm artificial trans fats pose to cardiovascular health is well-documented, but that doesn’t faze the food industry.

As New York University’s Dr. Marion Nestle writes on her Food Politics blog today:

“Food companies are complaining that the FDA has gone too far, needs to allow companies to keep small amounts in foods, and doesn’t really have the authority to revoke GRAS status.”

That, by the way, is pretty much every food company’s stance, since both the Grocery Manufacturers Association and the Food Marketing Institute (two industry lobbying groups) submitted comments to the FDA against the removal of artificial trans fats from the food supply. Talk about being on the wrong side of history!

Here is the interesting twist — the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics submitted comments in favor of revoking artificial trans fats. Great! But, this begs the question: why continue to accept funding from (and partner up with) food companies that, time and time again, make concerted efforts to block public health policy? Why does a nutrition organization have ties to companies that advocate against efforts that could help improve the health of Americans?

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Categories: Uncategorized Tags: FDA, Food Marketing Institute, GRAS, Grocery Manufacturers Association, Marion Nestle, trans fats

Reader Interactions

Leave a Comment Cancel

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

sidebar

Blog Sidebar

Social Media

FacebookTwitter

Subscribe to receive our quarterly newsletter and other breaking news!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Browse by Topic

  • Academic Research
  • Advocacy
  • Distinguished Dietitians
  • Ethical Sponsorship
  • Industry Spin
  • Industry-Funded Research
  • Interviews
  • Photos
  • Problematic Sponsorship
  • Recommended Reads
  • Reports
  • Statements of Concern
  • Uncategorized

Tags

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics American Beverage Association Andy Bellatti Big Tobacco California Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Center for Science in the Public Interest CEUs Civil Eats Coca-Cola ConAgra conflicts of interest Corn Refiners Association FNCE front groups General Mills Global Energy Balance Network Hershey's industry-funded research junk food Kellogg Kids Eat Right Kraft Kraft Singles lobbying Marion Nestle marketing marketing to children Mars McDonald's meat industry Michele Simon moderation National Dairy Council Nestlé New York Times PepsiCo policy soda soda tax soda taxes sugar The Sugar Association Unilever World Health Organization Yoni Freedhoff

Footer

Subscribe to receive our quarterly newsletter and other breaking news!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Recent Posts

Farewell to Our Supporters

Dear DFPI Supporters, Since February of 2013, we at Dietitians For Professional Integrity have been a voice for uplifting the registered dietitian credential at a time when corporate influences - both overt and covert Read More

Highly Processed Foods Can Negatively Impact Health

Good read from New York Times on how highly processed foods (and the ingredients in many of them) can negatively impact health by creating an imbalance in the gut microbiome. This is the future of nutrition. The fact Read More

Social Media

FacebookTwitter

RSS

  • RSS - Posts

© 2019 Dietitians for Professional Integrity