• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Dietitians for Professional Integrity

  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Resources
    • Advocacy & Action Toolkit
    • Conflict-Free CEUs
    • Distinguished Dietitians
    • Ethical Sponsorship
    • FNCE Guides & Reports
    • Like-Minded Organizations
    • RD Resource Toolkit
    • Statements of Concern
    • Understand The Issues
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Search

Jun 03, 2014 Leave a Comment

Once Again, Industry Pledges Fall Short

The problem of industry making “pledges” and “commitments” it doesn’t live up to is not just a phenomenon in the United States.

In the United Kingdom, this past Sunday’s Telegraph featured a news article detailing how “food companies signed up to the Government’s flagship “healthy eating” pledge have failed to reduce the amount of sugar in some of their best-known brands. The sugar and overall calorie levels in products such as Coca-Cola and Magnum ice creams have remained the same despite their manufacturers promising to help customers to “eat and drink fewer calories.”

The brands in question are the usual Big Food players — the same companies who help fund the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (and the same companies the Academy claims to be proud to partner with and holds up as paragons of virtue.)

Article highlights:

  • “After the Department of Health published its annual update on the Responsibility Deal last week, Jane Ellison, the public health minister, congratulated the food companies involved on their “successes”. But The Telegraph’s survey of action taken under the deal found that Coca-Cola has reduced the amount of sugar in drinks such as Sprite but left its flagship drink untouched. The firm behind Wall’s and Ben & Jerry’s ice creams has reduced the number of calories in “children’s ice creams” but not in ordinary ranges; Nestlé has cut the calories in Aero and white KitKat Chunky bars but not in ordinary milk chocolate KitKats.”
  • “Kawther Hashem, a nutritionist for Action on Sugar said: “Examples such as these show the Responsibility Deal’s calorie pledge is completely ineffectual.”
  • “Dr. Aseem Malhotra, a cardiologist and Action on Sugar’s science director, said the findings suggested food firms was simply paying “lip service” to the government by signing up to the calorie pledge. “This investigation by the Telegraph has exposed what a farce the responsibility deal really is and further substantiates why we cannot allow the food industry to have a say in health policy,” he added.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Categories: Uncategorized Tags: Action on Sugar, Aseem Malhotra, Coca-Cola

Reader Interactions

Leave a Comment Cancel

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

sidebar

Blog Sidebar

Social Media

FacebookTwitter

Subscribe to receive our quarterly newsletter and other breaking news!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Browse by Topic

  • Academic Research
  • Advocacy
  • Distinguished Dietitians
  • Ethical Sponsorship
  • Industry Spin
  • Industry-Funded Research
  • Interviews
  • Photos
  • Problematic Sponsorship
  • Recommended Reads
  • Reports
  • Statements of Concern
  • Uncategorized

Tags

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics American Beverage Association Andy Bellatti Big Tobacco California Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Center for Science in the Public Interest CEUs Civil Eats Coca-Cola ConAgra conflicts of interest Corn Refiners Association FNCE front groups General Mills Global Energy Balance Network Hershey's industry-funded research junk food Kellogg Kids Eat Right Kraft Kraft Singles lobbying Marion Nestle marketing marketing to children Mars McDonald's meat industry Michele Simon moderation National Dairy Council Nestlé New York Times PepsiCo policy soda soda tax soda taxes sugar The Sugar Association Unilever World Health Organization Yoni Freedhoff

Footer

Subscribe to receive our quarterly newsletter and other breaking news!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Recent Posts

Farewell to Our Supporters

Dear DFPI Supporters, Since February of 2013, we at Dietitians For Professional Integrity have been a voice for uplifting the registered dietitian credential at a time when corporate influences - both overt and covert Read More

Highly Processed Foods Can Negatively Impact Health

Good read from New York Times on how highly processed foods (and the ingredients in many of them) can negatively impact health by creating an imbalance in the gut microbiome. This is the future of nutrition. The fact Read More

Social Media

FacebookTwitter

RSS

  • RSS - Posts

© 2022 Dietitians for Professional Integrity