• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Dietitians for Professional Integrity

  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Resources
    • Advocacy & Action Toolkit
    • Conflict-Free CEUs
    • Distinguished Dietitians
    • Ethical Sponsorship
    • FNCE Guides & Reports
    • Like-Minded Organizations
    • RD Resource Toolkit
    • Statements of Concern
    • Understand The Issues
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Search

Jan 16, 2015 Leave a Comment

Today’s Dietitian Highlights Corporate Sponsorship Debate

This month’s issue of Today’s Dietitian magazine includes the first of two feature pieces on the topic of corporate sponsorships.

Among those expressing concern over sponsorships:

  • “These ties reflect poorly on our credential, because anybody who wants to criticize dietitians can make such an easy argument. If we got rid of these ties, we would take away a huge source of criticism,” says Andy Bellatti, MS, RD, a nutrition consultant who has been active in the issue of corporate sponsorships for dietitians.”
  • Marion Nestle, PhD, MPH, the Paulette Goddard Professor of Nutrition, Food Studies, and Public Health at New York University and author of Food Politics, says, “The pervasive sponsorship by food product makers puts the Academy in flagrant conflict of interest.”
  • “Nestle says, “Dietitians ought to be advising clients and the public about what to eat to stay healthy and prevent chronic disease. This necessarily means promoting consumption of some foods and discouraging consumption of others. Dietitians cannot speak truth to clients and protect corporate sponsorship at the same time.”
  • “Kate Geagan, MS, RDN, a nutrition and communications consultant for the food industry and author of Go Green, Get Lean, believes that, in some cases, the issue may be more about what’s not being said about foods, such as the case of the Academy not speaking up on antibiotic use in livestock. She adds, “I believe the problem is the lack of transparency regarding the full nature of these relationships—financial and access-wise—to both RD members and the public.”
  • “I wonder what clear benefit members are receiving, aside from RDNs that are employed by industry,” Bellatti continues. “The winners seem to be the food companies who gain direct access to members to promote products and to provide education to members about their products. That’s where we’re really failing; we’re disarming ourselves as the experts and instead allowing the industry to tell us what’s valuable. The food industry is now authorized to educate us through continuing education programs provided to RDs, rather than the other way around.”
  • “The goal of food companies is to sell products and expand sales to increase profits. That’s their job,” Nestle says. “The goal of dietitians is to improve the health of individual clients, patients, and groups. Ideally, companies would produce health-promoting products and their goals and the goals of dietitians would be compatible. In practice, such compatibility only rarely occurs.”

As for AND’s official stance:

“”While the Academy declined to make any new comments regarding its corporate sponsorship program for this article, it referred to a March 2013 interview with Today’s Dietitian. In this interview, Ethan Bergman, PhD, RD, then president of the Academy, stressed that the Academy doesn’t endorse any company, product, or service, regardless of sponsorship.”

The article also quotes dietitians who agree with the Academy’s current sponsorship model.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Categories: Problematic Sponsorship, Recommended Reads Tags: Andy Bellatti, Kate Geagan, Marion Nestle

Reader Interactions

Leave a Comment Cancel

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

sidebar

Blog Sidebar

Social Media

FacebookTwitter

Subscribe to receive our quarterly newsletter and other breaking news!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Browse by Topic

  • Academic Research
  • Advocacy
  • Distinguished Dietitians
  • Ethical Sponsorship
  • Industry Spin
  • Industry-Funded Research
  • Interviews
  • Photos
  • Problematic Sponsorship
  • Recommended Reads
  • Reports
  • Statements of Concern
  • Uncategorized

Tags

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics American Beverage Association Andy Bellatti Big Tobacco California Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Center for Science in the Public Interest CEUs Civil Eats Coca-Cola ConAgra conflicts of interest Corn Refiners Association FNCE front groups General Mills Global Energy Balance Network Hershey's industry-funded research junk food Kellogg Kids Eat Right Kraft Kraft Singles lobbying Marion Nestle marketing marketing to children Mars McDonald's meat industry Michele Simon moderation National Dairy Council Nestlé New York Times PepsiCo policy soda soda tax soda taxes sugar The Sugar Association Unilever World Health Organization Yoni Freedhoff

Footer

Subscribe to receive our quarterly newsletter and other breaking news!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Recent Posts

Farewell to Our Supporters

Dear DFPI Supporters, Since February of 2013, we at Dietitians For Professional Integrity have been a voice for uplifting the registered dietitian credential at a time when corporate influences - both overt and covert Read More

Highly Processed Foods Can Negatively Impact Health

Good read from New York Times on how highly processed foods (and the ingredients in many of them) can negatively impact health by creating an imbalance in the gut microbiome. This is the future of nutrition. The fact Read More

Social Media

FacebookTwitter

RSS

  • RSS - Posts

© 2021 Dietitians for Professional Integrity