• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Dietitians for Professional Integrity

  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Resources
    • Advocacy & Action Toolkit
    • Conflict-Free CEUs
    • Distinguished Dietitians
    • Ethical Sponsorship
    • FNCE Guides & Reports
    • Like-Minded Organizations
    • RD Resource Toolkit
    • Statements of Concern
    • Understand The Issues
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Search

Jul 08, 2015 Leave a Comment

A Sneak Peek at the School Nutrition Association’s Upcoming Conference

In her latest article, Dana Woldow of Beyond Chron takes a look at the upcoming School Nutrition Association (SNA) conference — and the large role Big Food plays.

Highlights:

  • “With Congress working on the reauthorization of all child nutrition programs, including school meals, this year, SNA has come out strongly in favor of gutting those nutrition regulations. The organization leadership wants to allow more refined grains and sodium, and fewer fruits and vegetables, in school meals, and objects to Smart Snacks in Schools rules that have limited sales of snacks and junk food. Some have accused SNA of being little more than a front group for processed food manufacturers”
  • “The SNA sponsorship brochure lists over $300,000 worth of sponsorship opportunities for the ANC. As the brochure says, “Sponsorship opportunities are available at many price points so you can find the best fit for your marketing budget.”
  • Just $3,300 buys the chance to provide one item to be included in every official conference tote bag, where attendees might find an Otis Spunkmeyer Delicious Essentials cookie (“Healthy products don’t have to taste bad”).”
  • “For the biggest bang, three lucky companies can each pay $25,000 to sponsor one of the general sessions (“Introduce the speaker…provide one collateral piece to be distributed as attendees enter the room… Your company name and logo strategically built into the entrance signage at the hall and displayed on large screens as attendees enter and exit the session.”)
  • So who are those generous sponsors? Jennie-O Turkey spent over $25,000 on SNA’s ANC this year, while Domino’s Pizza, General Mills, the National Dairy Council (chocolate milk at breakfast!), Pepsi, Schwan’s, Tyson and Uncle Ben’s (Unilever) each forked over between $10,000-$24,999 to get their names out in front of the school food service folks.”
  • “To be fair, there are plenty of worthwhile-sounding educational sessions at the ANC (“Experiential Nutrition Education: Promoting Healthy Habits”), and speakers like Dayle Hayes MS, RD, a tireless advocate for healthy school meals, whose excellent article “10 Ways School Lunch Haters Can Support Real School Food’ ‪appeared in Beyond Chron in April.

So it’s not all just shilling for Big Food companies, and no doubt school food professionals can tell the difference between marketing and true education.

It’s just that the food and beverage industry spends billions annually on marketing (with the typical company spending about $4 million on marketing alone in 2013) for one reason and one reason only – because it works – and no one is immune to its effects.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Categories: Problematic Sponsorship Tags: Dana Woldow, Dayle Hayes, Domino's, General Mills, National Dairy Council, PepsiCo, School Nutrition Association, Schwan's, Tyson, Uncle Ben's, Unilever

Reader Interactions

Leave a Comment Cancel

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

sidebar

Blog Sidebar

Social Media

FacebookTwitter

Subscribe to receive our quarterly newsletter and other breaking news!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Browse by Topic

  • Academic Research
  • Advocacy
  • Distinguished Dietitians
  • Ethical Sponsorship
  • Industry Spin
  • Industry-Funded Research
  • Interviews
  • Photos
  • Problematic Sponsorship
  • Recommended Reads
  • Reports
  • Statements of Concern
  • Uncategorized

Tags

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics American Beverage Association Andy Bellatti Big Tobacco California Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Center for Science in the Public Interest CEUs Civil Eats Coca-Cola ConAgra conflicts of interest Corn Refiners Association FNCE front groups General Mills Global Energy Balance Network Hershey's industry-funded research junk food Kellogg Kids Eat Right Kraft Kraft Singles lobbying Marion Nestle marketing marketing to children Mars McDonald's meat industry Michele Simon moderation National Dairy Council Nestlé New York Times PepsiCo policy soda soda tax soda taxes sugar The Sugar Association Unilever World Health Organization Yoni Freedhoff

Footer

Subscribe to receive our quarterly newsletter and other breaking news!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Recent Posts

Farewell to Our Supporters

Dear DFPI Supporters, Since February of 2013, we at Dietitians For Professional Integrity have been a voice for uplifting the registered dietitian credential at a time when corporate influences - both overt and covert Read More

Highly Processed Foods Can Negatively Impact Health

Good read from New York Times on how highly processed foods (and the ingredients in many of them) can negatively impact health by creating an imbalance in the gut microbiome. This is the future of nutrition. The fact Read More

Social Media

FacebookTwitter

RSS

  • RSS - Posts

© 2022 Dietitians for Professional Integrity