• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Dietitians for Professional Integrity

  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Resources
    • Advocacy & Action Toolkit
    • Conflict-Free CEUs
    • Distinguished Dietitians
    • Ethical Sponsorship
    • FNCE Guides & Reports
    • Like-Minded Organizations
    • RD Resource Toolkit
    • Statements of Concern
    • Understand The Issues
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Search

Sep 26, 2016 3 Comments

Concerns About Dairy Industry Sponsorship

dairy-food-112909149Although Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, General Mills, and Kellogg are no longer Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics sponsors, the National Dairy Council continues to be a premier sponsor.
 
We find the National Dairy Council’s presence problematic largely based on the fact that federal nutrition guidelines on dairy have been largely influenced by dairy industry lobbying and industry-funded research. which at often times trumped objective science.
 
Our interest is not to discuss dairy in a polarizing “it’s the best food on earth!” versus “it’s poison!” dichotomy that doesn’t enhance dialogue. Rather, we urge you to think about the implications of the National Dairy Council sponsoring a nutrition organization and also offering continuing education to nutrition professionals.
 
For context, we share this 2004 article from the Wall Street Journal that examined the decisions to increase federal recommendations from two servings of dairy a day to three.
 
Highlights:
  • “The new advice is a major victory for the $50 billion U.S. dairy industry, which has long lobbied for increased consumption guidelines. Currently, Americans eat or drink about 1.5 servings of dairy products per day, according to the Agriculture Department. Despite the dairy industry’s iconic “Got Milk?” ad campaign, per-capita fluid milk sales have fallen nearly 3% over the past five years. The suggested boost in dairy intake could spell big profits for the industry, as federal nutrition programs such as school lunch menus are adjusted to conform.”
  • “Walter Willett, a physician and chairman of the department of nutrition at Harvard University’s School of Public Health, calls the committee report “egregious,” saying it excludes at least six major studies linking dairy consumption to prostate cancer. “There is no nutritional requirement for dairy at all,” he insists. “Huge parts of the world do not even consume dairy.” Dr. Willett has written a book supporting a drastic overhaul of the food pyramid with only one to two servings of dairy or a calcium supplement.
  • “The dairy industry campaigned intensely, initially lobbying for three to four servings daily. It also launched a new “3-A-Day” ad campaign, supported by companies like Kraft Foods Inc., a major cheese and yogurt maker. Industry representative repeatedly warned of a “calcium crisis,” blaming Americans’ per-capita consumption of some 52 gallons of soft drinks annually compared with 25 gallons of milk, according to Euromonitor International Inc., a London-based market-research firm.”
  • “The National Dairy Council, funded by the nation’s dairy farmers, spent $4 million to $5 million on research last year, much of it concluding that the calcium and other nutrients in vitamin-fortified milk, cheese and other milk products help keep people of all ages healthy. Nearly a third of the dairy studies cited in the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee’s report were written by a researcher who has received National Dairy Council funding either for immediate or past work, according to records from the organization and other funding disclosures on published papers.”
  • “At least three of the 13 committee members — Connie Weaver, head of the department of foods and nutrition at Purdue University; Theresa A. Nicklas, a professor of pediatrics at Baylor College of Medicine; and Penny Kris-Etherton, professor at Pennsylvania State University — have received National Dairy Council funding within the past five years. The committee assigned Dr. Weaver, who holds a doctorate in nutrition, much of the work on dairy consumption, Dr. Weaver says, adding that she drafted the majority of statements concerning dairy consumption before the full committee modified and eventually approved them.”
  • “In the end, the primary rationale for the increased dairy recommendation didn’t involve calcium, according to Dr. Weaver. Rather, the committee focused on a recent report from the Institute of Medicine advocating larger amounts of potassium — 4,700 milligrams per day — in the American diet.”
If that’s the case, then higher intakes of plant-based foods — particularly vegetables, beans, legumes, and fruit — would be more appropriate. Alas, those foods have next to no lobbying power behind them.
 
Keep in mind that the Academy boasts that “since 2003, the National Dairy Council® and the Academy, along with other leading health care organizations, have teamed up to educate the public about the recommended three daily servings of dairy and the nutrition and health benefits of dairy foods (i.e., fat-free or low-fat milk and milk products, including lactose-free dairy milk, cheese and yogurt).”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Categories: Industry Spin, Problematic Sponsorship Tags: Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, conflicts of interest, industry-funded research, National Dairy Council

Reader Interactions

Leave a Comment Cancel

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comments

  1. Clarence says

    October 12, 2018 at 9:18 pm

    What about the studies showing older people consuming dairy had higher hip fractures? Due to the body drawing calcium out of the bones to neutralize the acidity of the blood after drinking milk!! Milk was and is designed to grow a calf to 500-600 pounds in 205 days! It is not mother’s milk!

    Reply
  2. David Gassman says

    June 9, 2020 at 9:49 am

    Fascinating! Sometimes research is never aimed at what the title is. (Referring to the institute of Medicine advocating larger amounts of potassium)

    Reply
  3. JUSTICE M HENDRIX says

    June 14, 2020 at 7:28 am

    1. Who were some of the previous sponsors of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics?
    The previous sponsors of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics were Coco-Cola, Pepsico, General Mills, and Kellogg.
    2. What fraction of the dairy studies cited in the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee’s report were written by a researcher that had received National Dairy Council funding either for immediate or past work? ________________ Then this would mean that what fraction of studies did the researchers not receive money from the National Dairy Council? __________
    Harvard School &
    3. What was the primary rationale for increased dairy consumption?
    the primary rationale for increased dairy consumption is 52 gallons.
    4. What are some other ways besides dairy to get this mineral in your diet?
    Some other ways besides dairy to get these minerals in one’s diet is potassium.
    5. In your opinion, what are some other ways our food choices and information about food are influenced?
    In my opinion, some other ways our food choices and information about food are influenced by people who don’t really know how to be healthy or on a healthy diet. A lot of people don’t actually know how to be on a healthy diet.

    Reply

sidebar

Blog Sidebar

Social Media

FacebookTwitter

Subscribe to receive our quarterly newsletter and other breaking news!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Browse by Topic

  • Academic Research
  • Advocacy
  • Distinguished Dietitians
  • Ethical Sponsorship
  • Industry Spin
  • Industry-Funded Research
  • Interviews
  • Photos
  • Problematic Sponsorship
  • Recommended Reads
  • Reports
  • Statements of Concern
  • Uncategorized

Tags

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics American Beverage Association Andy Bellatti Big Tobacco California Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Center for Science in the Public Interest CEUs Civil Eats Coca-Cola ConAgra conflicts of interest Corn Refiners Association FNCE front groups General Mills Global Energy Balance Network Hershey's industry-funded research junk food Kellogg Kids Eat Right Kraft Kraft Singles lobbying Marion Nestle marketing marketing to children Mars McDonald's meat industry Michele Simon moderation National Dairy Council Nestlé New York Times PepsiCo policy soda soda tax soda taxes sugar The Sugar Association Unilever World Health Organization Yoni Freedhoff

Footer

Subscribe to receive our quarterly newsletter and other breaking news!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Recent Posts

Farewell to Our Supporters

Dear DFPI Supporters, Since February of 2013, we at Dietitians For Professional Integrity have been a voice for uplifting the registered dietitian credential at a time when corporate influences - both overt and covert Read More

Highly Processed Foods Can Negatively Impact Health

Good read from New York Times on how highly processed foods (and the ingredients in many of them) can negatively impact health by creating an imbalance in the gut microbiome. This is the future of nutrition. The fact Read More

Social Media

FacebookTwitter

RSS

  • RSS - Posts

© 2021 Dietitians for Professional Integrity