• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Dietitians for Professional Integrity

  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Resources
    • Advocacy & Action Toolkit
    • Conflict-Free CEUs
    • Distinguished Dietitians
    • Ethical Sponsorship
    • FNCE Guides & Reports
    • Like-Minded Organizations
    • RD Resource Toolkit
    • Statements of Concern
    • Understand The Issues
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Search

Nov 08, 2016 Leave a Comment

The Current State of Baby and Toddler Food Marketing

babyfoodfacts_baby-and-toddler-snacks_infographicLast week, the UConn Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity published its Baby Food FACTS (Food Advertising to Children and Teens Score) report, which examines the nutrition and marketing of baby and toddler food and drinks.

Executive summary highlights:

  • “We used a variety of data sources and methods to provide a comprehensive analysis of food and drink products marketed for babies and toddlers in the United States. Through publicly available data, we document and evaluate the nutrient content of baby and toddler food, infant formula, toddler milk, and nutritional supplements for children under age 3 and the marketing practices used to promote these products.”
  • “In 2015, advertising spending for baby and toddler food, infant formula, toddler milk, and one nutritional supplement brand aimed at young children totaled $77 million in all media, primarily TV and magazines. Just eight brands from three companies were responsible for 99% of advertising spending and all TV advertising exposure for their respective categories in 2015.”
  • “We found many examples of marketing messages that imply that commercially prepared baby and toddler food, infant formula, toddler milk, and nutritional
    supplements are nutritionally superior and/or provide developmental advantages compared with breastmilk or whole milk and table food for toddlers.”
  • “Common marketing themes also presented commercial products as a “solution” to normal stages of children’s development, such as crying and not sleeping through the night for babies or picky eating for toddlers.”
  • “Furthermore, this marketing often promoted products that experts do not recommend serving to young children – including nutritionally poor snacks, toddler milk, and energy-dense nutritional supplements – and implied that these products are beneficial for most young children. Many do not support the development of adequate dietary behaviors, acceptance of the family’s diet, and healthy food preferences, particularly fruits and vegetables.”
  • “The United States could follow the lead of 135 other countries and the U.S. Congress could pass laws consistent with WHO guidance to address aggressive promotion of breastmilk substitutes. Provisions in the original WHO Code and the recent WHO Guidance would curtail all marketing for infant formula, toddler milk, and baby food for children under 6 months.”
  • “The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) could use WIC’s considerable purchasing power and leverage to require WIC suppliers to create infant formula labels free from unnecessary marketing messages and refrain from other questionable marketing practices.”
  • “Healthcare providers serving Hispanic communities in particular should be aware of the extensive marketing for toddler milk and nutritional supplement brands aimed at Hispanic mothers.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Categories: Reports Tags: marketing to children, Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity

Reader Interactions

Leave a Comment Cancel

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

sidebar

Blog Sidebar

Social Media

FacebookTwitter

Subscribe to receive our quarterly newsletter and other breaking news!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Browse by Topic

  • Academic Research
  • Advocacy
  • Distinguished Dietitians
  • Ethical Sponsorship
  • Industry Spin
  • Industry-Funded Research
  • Interviews
  • Photos
  • Problematic Sponsorship
  • Recommended Reads
  • Reports
  • Statements of Concern
  • Uncategorized

Tags

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics American Beverage Association Andy Bellatti Big Tobacco California Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Center for Science in the Public Interest CEUs Civil Eats Coca-Cola ConAgra conflicts of interest Corn Refiners Association FNCE front groups General Mills Global Energy Balance Network Hershey's industry-funded research junk food Kellogg Kids Eat Right Kraft Kraft Singles lobbying Marion Nestle marketing marketing to children Mars McDonald's meat industry Michele Simon moderation National Dairy Council Nestlé New York Times PepsiCo policy soda soda tax soda taxes sugar The Sugar Association Unilever World Health Organization Yoni Freedhoff

Footer

Subscribe to receive our quarterly newsletter and other breaking news!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Recent Posts

Farewell to Our Supporters

Dear DFPI Supporters, Since February of 2013, we at Dietitians For Professional Integrity have been a voice for uplifting the registered dietitian credential at a time when corporate influences - both overt and covert Read More

Highly Processed Foods Can Negatively Impact Health

Good read from New York Times on how highly processed foods (and the ingredients in many of them) can negatively impact health by creating an imbalance in the gut microbiome. This is the future of nutrition. The fact Read More

Social Media

FacebookTwitter

RSS

  • RSS - Posts

© 2021 Dietitians for Professional Integrity