• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Dietitians for Professional Integrity

  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Resources
    • Advocacy & Action Toolkit
    • Conflict-Free CEUs
    • Distinguished Dietitians
    • Ethical Sponsorship
    • FNCE Guides & Reports
    • Like-Minded Organizations
    • RD Resource Toolkit
    • Statements of Concern
    • Understand The Issues
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Search

Feb 26, 2017 1 Comment

The Academy’s New President-Elect & Reflections On This Recent Election

Congratulations to Mary Russell, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics’ new president-elect (see the full list of election winners here).

As has been our tradition, DFPI will be in touch with the new president-elect to invite her to engage in dialogue on the issues that are important to us and all of our supporters.

This Academy election received national media attention due to president-elect candidate Neva Cochran’s not-always-fully-disclosed industry ties — especially to the American Beverage Association (see this Ninjas for Health post for details).

A candidate’s work experience is a valid point of discussion during an election. Bringing up industry ties is not a personal attack. As an organization, DFPI always encourages open and respectful dialogue about this issue.

Many dietitians have privately expressed to us frustration about the intimidation they have experienced for speaking out about these issues. We were also dismayed to learn that, as has been reported, the Academy apparently attempted to stifle discussion (for more details on that, see this Mic.com post).

Concerns surrounding industry ties and health organizations, health professionals, and academic research have increased significantly in the past few years:

  • The World Health Organization has spoken out about  industry-funded research”that confuses the evidence and keeps the public in doubt.”
  • Reputable public health journals around the world have published many articles detailing why these ties are problematic (for  just two examples, see this and this).
  • Leading global newspapers have written on the topic.

As a science-based profession, we need to consider the research literature on conflicts of interest and corporate-funded research, which concludes that funding source has an effect on researchers, even if subconscious and subtle.

We deliberately chose to take a “wait and see” approach regarding the outcome of this election. Our goal, first and foremost, is to reform the Academy regardless of who is president. The issues we advocate on are bigger than one election or one president’s term. Our concern is, and always has been, about how these industry ties negatively impact the way our profession operates and how they do not align with the Academy’s own mission statement or its standard of ethics. Our plan was to continue our advocacy efforts regardless of which candidate won.

Lastly, we want to take this opportunity to encourage dietitians who had concerns about this election to keep the conversation going. Make your voices heard — passionately, but always respectfully and level-headed.

Run for elected positions (this is key!). Bring up this issue at your local dietetic associations (the Los Angeles Dietetic Association is hosting a one-day conference in April that will feature three debates, one of them on corporate sponsorship). Use our Action & Advocacy toolkit to help guide your efforts. Help make the Academy an organization that makes you proud to hold the credential you worked so hard to earn.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Categories: Advocacy Tags: Academy elections, Coca-Cola, conflicts of interest, Mary Russell, Neva Cochran, soda

Reader Interactions

Leave a Comment Cancel

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comments

  1. Nate says

    March 2, 2017 at 8:49 am

    I am not a dietitian. But I have two book selves of diet and nutrition books, all of which I have read and some studied. This is because I’ve been a type 1 diabetic for 51 years and started eating a Low Carb, High Fat diet in 2004. I am alive today and not totally blind because of that diet change.

    In 2004, my A1c averaged 7.2. It now averages 6.0. It is not lower because of my very bad gastroparesis. My frozen shoulders and trigger fingers went away on the second day of following a LCHF diet. Within three months of starting to eat LCHF, I lost over 30 pounds without even trying to do that. My goal was getting my A1c down. I also cut my insulin load in half in 2004.

    The calories in, calories out theory needs to die, especially for all diabetics. My motto: It’s the Insulin, Stupid.

    Reply

sidebar

Blog Sidebar

Social Media

FacebookTwitter

Subscribe to receive our quarterly newsletter and other breaking news!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Browse by Topic

  • Academic Research
  • Advocacy
  • Distinguished Dietitians
  • Ethical Sponsorship
  • Industry Spin
  • Industry-Funded Research
  • Interviews
  • Photos
  • Problematic Sponsorship
  • Recommended Reads
  • Reports
  • Statements of Concern
  • Uncategorized

Tags

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics American Beverage Association Andy Bellatti Big Tobacco California Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Center for Science in the Public Interest CEUs Civil Eats Coca-Cola ConAgra conflicts of interest Corn Refiners Association FNCE front groups General Mills Global Energy Balance Network Hershey's industry-funded research junk food Kellogg Kids Eat Right Kraft Kraft Singles lobbying Marion Nestle marketing marketing to children Mars McDonald's meat industry Michele Simon moderation National Dairy Council Nestlé New York Times PepsiCo policy soda soda tax soda taxes sugar The Sugar Association Unilever World Health Organization Yoni Freedhoff

Footer

Subscribe to receive our quarterly newsletter and other breaking news!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Recent Posts

Farewell to Our Supporters

Dear DFPI Supporters, Since February of 2013, we at Dietitians For Professional Integrity have been a voice for uplifting the registered dietitian credential at a time when corporate influences - both overt and covert Read More

Highly Processed Foods Can Negatively Impact Health

Good read from New York Times on how highly processed foods (and the ingredients in many of them) can negatively impact health by creating an imbalance in the gut microbiome. This is the future of nutrition. The fact Read More

Social Media

FacebookTwitter

RSS

  • RSS - Posts

© 2021 Dietitians for Professional Integrity