• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Dietitians for Professional Integrity

  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Resources
    • Advocacy & Action Toolkit
    • Conflict-Free CEUs
    • Distinguished Dietitians
    • Ethical Sponsorship
    • FNCE Guides & Reports
    • Like-Minded Organizations
    • RD Resource Toolkit
    • Statements of Concern
    • Understand The Issues
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Search

May 11, 2017 Leave a Comment

Conflicts of Interest in Continuing Medical Education

The latest issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association offers several articles on conflicts of interest.

Today, we share one that also relates to nutrition and dietetics: conflicts of interest (COI) in continuing education.

Highlights:

* “Accredited continuing medical education (CME) activities are a key resource for providing credible and accessible information. However, serious concerns have been raised about the effectiveness of CME, from the perspectives of educational design as well as potential influence from commercial and other interests.”

* “Disclosure of COI involving faculty and planners involved in continuing education activities to learners as currently required by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) has many limitations. First, this disclosure is restricted to manufacturers, distributors, re-sellers, and marketers of products that are used by patients (essentially the drug and device industries), failing to address other commercial entities that might be relevant to professional practice, such as consulting firms, medical record companies, and diagnostic laboratories.”

* “In addition, the ACCME focuses only on financial relationships, ignoring other possible sources of COI such as uncompensated board memberships, research interests, and institutional affiliations.”

* “Although these ACCME requirements have been in effect for more than 10 years, it is discouraging to note that organizations continue to struggle to meet them. For example, in the March 2016 accreditation cohort, more than 30% of 46 surveyed CME providers were in noncompliance with one or more of the elements relating to disclosure and resolution of COI.”

* “The acceptance of industry funding in the form of both grants and advertising and exhibit revenue can create an institutional financial conflict of interest, with the potential to adversely affect not only educational programming but also other key organizational priorities.”

* “The COI may bias the choice of topics in favor of those that are more aligned with the interests of industry rather than the mission of the organization.”

Continuing education should not be an extension of public relations and marketing.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Categories: Problematic Sponsorship, Recommended Reads Tags: Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education, conflicts of interest, continuing education, JAMA

Reader Interactions

Leave a Comment Cancel

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

sidebar

Blog Sidebar

Social Media

FacebookTwitter

Subscribe to receive our quarterly newsletter and other breaking news!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Browse by Topic

  • Academic Research
  • Advocacy
  • Distinguished Dietitians
  • Ethical Sponsorship
  • Industry Spin
  • Industry-Funded Research
  • Interviews
  • Photos
  • Problematic Sponsorship
  • Recommended Reads
  • Reports
  • Statements of Concern
  • Uncategorized

Tags

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics American Beverage Association Andy Bellatti Big Tobacco California Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Center for Science in the Public Interest CEUs Civil Eats Coca-Cola ConAgra conflicts of interest Corn Refiners Association FNCE front groups General Mills Global Energy Balance Network Hershey's industry-funded research junk food Kellogg Kids Eat Right Kraft Kraft Singles lobbying Marion Nestle marketing marketing to children Mars McDonald's meat industry Michele Simon moderation National Dairy Council Nestlé New York Times PepsiCo policy soda soda tax soda taxes sugar The Sugar Association Unilever World Health Organization Yoni Freedhoff

Footer

Subscribe to receive our quarterly newsletter and other breaking news!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Recent Posts

Farewell to Our Supporters

Dear DFPI Supporters, Since February of 2013, we at Dietitians For Professional Integrity have been a voice for uplifting the registered dietitian credential at a time when corporate influences - both overt and covert Read More

Highly Processed Foods Can Negatively Impact Health

Good read from New York Times on how highly processed foods (and the ingredients in many of them) can negatively impact health by creating an imbalance in the gut microbiome. This is the future of nutrition. The fact Read More

Social Media

FacebookTwitter

RSS

  • RSS - Posts

© 2021 Dietitians for Professional Integrity